It came as a shock to many of us when Deep Blue defeated Kasparov in a 6 game match in 1997. A computer had beaten the best human player in this game that to many is a defining symbol of human intellect. Even though it was “only chess”, it had to be a sign of the inevitable. The machines would soon be taking over man’s role as earth’s ruling race.
But wait a minute. The extremely high profile of the Deep Blue match may have been misleading. In an article at ChessBase, Jeff Sonas explains that the battle is not lost yet. In fact, top chess players have taken on computers 7 times since 1997, all of them ending with a draw. Was it just a stroke of luck for Deep Blue back then?
Continue reading
The fourth and last review of
BBC yesterday posted
Third in Wetware’s
The second review of Wetware-related
First in the series of reviews of the Wetware-related
The Human Genome project and the project to create a championship chess playing program are among the projects recognized by the
The single thing in the philosophy of mind that has surprised me the most is the
Few things amuse me more than pointing out to people how predictable we humans are. Our imprinted view of ourselves as almost not a part of the animal kingdom is of course very arrogant. Our animal-like behavior is however often quite apparent and one of the best examples is in
At the Sydney Olympics in 2000, 28 of 33 Olympic Gold Medals were earned in