english

Scientists Have Found That Scientists Are Often Wrong

I tend to be very skeptical about news articles where the headline reads: “Scientists have found that…”. Too often the scientist or researchers involved aren’t even named and there is no way of digging in further to see if it was indeed professional scientific work that led to the conclusion.

This is especially annoying as research that makes headlines is usually negative and or contradictory stuff: something may cause cancer, something contradicts common beliefs, something radically new has been discovered or invented. And these are exactly the research findings that are most likely to be wrong. The criticism that may follow the new discoveries hardly ever makes the news so the public sits up with the headline as THE TRUTH and never learns that the research was fundamentally flawed or the “scientist” was actually a fabulation of a reporter at “The News Of The World”.
Continue reading

AI Actors in Lord of the Rings

As “The Return of the King” is taking the world by storm I think it is suiting to point to this entertaining and informative article from Popular Science last November (after the release of “The Two Towers“). The article explains the AI system that is used to control the characters in the massive battle scenes.

Each orc in a battle has a “mind of his own” making decisions and responding to unexpected happenings. The same goes for every elf, man, uruk-hai, ghost, troll, ent and what have you. The decision trees that are used in the AI system are quite complex, and even though “intelligence” is hardly a word one would directly associate with an average orc, the AI orcs perhaps turned out to be more clever than intended:

“In another early simulation, Jackson and Regelous watched as several thousand characters fought like hell while, in the background, a small contingent of combatants seemed to think better of it and run away. They weren’t programmed to do this. It just happened.” (page 4)